FABRICATION GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS It is the consensus opinion of this group that MEMS fabrication technologies, in certain selected areas, have matured beyond the research and development stage and have enabled several high-volume products. Currently, the largest market segments for the MEMS industry include silicon-based pressure sensors, air-bag crash sensors, print heads for ink-jet printers, and digital light processors (DLP) for video projectors. The fabrication technologies that enable these high-volume products fall under two broad categories: bulk micromachining (e.g., pressure sensors and ink-jet print heads) and surface micromachining (e.g., air-bag accelerometers and DLP). Challenges It is the consensus of this group that there remain significant challenges in MEMS fabrications that are worth investigating. There is little dispute that MEMS fabrication research requires a multi-disciplined approach. In contrast to the IC industry, there are virtually no standardized MEMS fabrication techniques equivalent to the CMOS technology that will satisfy a majority of MEMS device fabrication needs. The materials used in MEMS fabrication are also far more varied than in electronics. Furthermore, compared with the IC industry, the volumes in MEMS are inherently lower due to the specialized nature of the specific devices. Finally, it is also obvious to this group that MEMS fabrication is coupled with the specific application as well as packaging and reliability, which are the subject matters of the other two groups. Due to the vast diversity in MEMS fabrication methods and the intended applications, the task to establish prioritized lists for research investment and technology roadmaps are more complicated than those for the microelectronics industries. This group engaged in in-depth discussions on this issue. Several findings are outlined in this report. Research Topics There are several proposed research topics in MEMS fabrication: LIGA and Ultra-Deep LIGA The goals are to establish a LIGA process that is manufacturable and to enable precision microstructures as thick as several mm. Research issues include
The potential benefits include
Further Miniaturization and Nanofabrication The goal is to establish processes to create sub-micron-scale devices. Research issues include
The potential benefits include
Polymers and Other New Materials The goal is to establish processes that incorporate new materials beyond silicon, such as "active" materials, optical coatings, polymers, plastic, biodegradable materials, etc. Research issues include
The potential benefits include
Manufacturing Sciences and manufacturing infrastructures The goals are to establish the technology to ensure manufacturability and to establish a resource for flexible manufacturing to support different process sequences while maintaining high quality, reproducibility, and relative low cost. The specific research topics include
The benefits include
Analyses of Research Topics The group analyzed the proposed research topics in relative terms of technology push vs. application pull as well as near term (a few years) vs. long term (10 years and beyond). The results are summarized in Table I. It should be noted that the listed research topics all require variable degrees of design tools and CAD abstraction technologies. |
|||||
Table 1. Comparison of the four research topics in MEMS fabrication in relative terms* |
|||||
|
* "T" represents strong technology push and "t" weak technology push, while "A" represents strong application pull and "a", weak application pull. Similarly for "N", "n", "L", and "l" for near term vs. long term. One clear observation that stands out from the analyses is that the topic of MEMS manufacturing sciences and infrastructure should be at the top of research priorities because there exists a critical near-term need that is based on strong application pull. This research topic has the potential of maximum impact on the advancement of the MEMS field and the highest payoff on research investment. However, due to some inevitable issues in sensitivity and competitiveness in the commercial arena, the government needs to play a crucial role in facilitating pre-competitive collaboration in the pursuit of this topic to eliminate wasteful duplication of research efforts and to lower the entry barriers for general MEMS developers.
|